The Safety and Security Category under the Social Pillar considers three core indicators and one supporting indicator to calculate the category Index. It primarily looks at number of streets and junctions under surveillance, incidence of crimes, crimes against women and accident cases.
A total of 4 parameters have been considered for determining the Safety and Security Index. These have been explained below. Kindly click each parameter for detailed description and tentative sources of information.
| No. | Name | Unit | Benchmark | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | Number of streets, public places, junctions covered through surveillance systems | Percentage | 100% | |
|
Description:
The extent to which public areas such as streets, public places like transport interchanges, government buildings, recreational spaces etc. and major traffic junctions in the city are covered through Closed-circuit Television (CCTV) surveillance cameras. This can facilitate real time monitoring of instances of crime or accident and quicker responses in emergency situations. Such surveillance systems can result in improved security and incidence management, and in the specific case of traffic junctions, also help in obtaining real time information regarding pedestrian and vehicular flow for monitoring road accidents.
Expressed as:
Number of streets, public places and major traffic junctions covered through CCTV cameras
X 100 =
Total number of streets, public places and major traffic junctions in the city
Methodology / Interpretation and Sources of Data:
|
||||
| 5.2 | Number of recorded crimes per lakh population | Crimes per lakh | City with the lowest crime rate (amongst cities in the same city-size classification as given in this document) will be treated as a benchmark | |
|
Description:
This denotes the prevalent crime rate in a city. Lower crime rates are indicative of higher levels of safety and security in a city, due to effective surveillance in public spaces, better SOS and crime registration systems, and police response mechanisms. Better planning and programming of public spaces, illumination of streets, compact and active neighbourhoods can also contribute to safer cities.
Expressed as:
Total number of crimes recorded in a year
X 1,00,000 =
Total population of the city
Methodology/
Interpretation and Sources of Data:
|
||||
| 5.3 | Extent of crimes recorded against women, children and elderly per year | Percentage | City with the lowest proportion of crimes against vulnerable groups (amongst cities in the same city-size classification as given in this document) will be treated as a benchmark | |
|
Description:
This denotes the proportion of crimes committed against vulnerable groups such as women, children and elderly.
Expressed as:
Number of crimes recorded against vulnerable groups (women, children and elderly) in a year
X 100 =
Total crimes recorded in the same year
Methodology/
Interpretation and Sources of Data:
|
||||
| 5.4 | Transport-related fatality per lakh population | Fatality per lakh | <=2 persons per lakh | |
|
Description:
This denotes the level of safety of transport networks in the city. Better managed transport systems will tend to be safer and record lower transport related fatalities. Service Level Benchmarks (SLBs) for Urban Transport developed by the MoUD provide guidance on the service levels for transport.
Expressed as:
Total number of fatalities recorded in road accidents in a year
X 1,00,000 =
Total population of the city
Methodology/
Interpretation and Sources of Data:
|
||||