The Identity and Culture Category under the Social Pillar considers three core indicators and two supporting indicators to calculate the category Index. It looks at tangible cultural elements like historic buildings and cultural events held in the city.
A total of 5 parameters have been considered for determining the Identity and Culture Index. These have been explained below. Kindly click each parameter for detailed description and tentative sources of information.
| No. | Name | Unit | Benchmark | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1 | Restoration and reuse of historic buildings (Average for buildings listed by ASI, State ASI and Local Authority) | Percentage | 100% | |
|
Description:
The extent to which planning and development in the city respects historic buildings/sites and the existing cultural landscape, through projects for preservation/restoration and adaptive reuse. Heritage assets are listed by the Archaeological survey of india (Asi) and various state Asis. City governments may also undertake listing of buildings, sites, precincts considered historically significant locally due to their cultural importance. the guidelines for local listing and grading of heritage assets are provided by the town and Country Planning Organization (tCPO), MoUD (Model Heritage Regulations, 2011).
Expressed as:
Average for buildings listed by ASI, State ASI and Local Authority Number of historic buildings/sites restored/preserved/brought under adaptive reuse
X 100 =
Total number of historic buildings/sites identified
Methodology/
Interpretation and Sources of Data:
|
||||
| 2.2 | Percentage of ecologically important areas covered through projects for restoration | Percentage | 100% | |
|
Description:
The extent to which the city has taken ecologically sensitive areas (natural heritage) into consideration during the process of planning and development. ecologically sensitive sites will include surface water bodies, urban watershed (natural drainage lines), coastlines, riverfronts, wetlands and urban forests. such sites are often ignored in the process of urban development and suffer from invasive development along the edges, deterioration due to dumping of wastes and waste water, pollution, silting and narrowing etc. Restoration of such sites can lead to better urban environment and sustainable development.
Expressed as:
cologically important sites covered through projects for restoration
X 100 =
Total number of ecologically important sites identified in the city
Methodology/
Interpretation and Sources of Data:
|
||||
| 2.3 | Hotel Occupancy | Percentage | City with the highest performance (amongst cities in the same city-size classification as given in this document) will be treated as a benchmark | |
|
Description:
The extent to which the city has taken ecologically sensitive areas (natural heritage) into consideration during the process of planning and development. ecologically sensitive sites will include surface water bodies, urban watershed (natural drainage lines), coastlines, riverfronts, wetlands and urban forests. such sites are often ignored in the process of urban development and suffer from invasive development along the edges, deterioration due to dumping of wastes and waste water, pollution, silting and narrowing etc. Restoration of such sites can lead to better urban environment and sustainable development.
Expressed as:
cologically important sites covered through projects for restoration
X 100 =
Total number of ecologically important sites identified in the city
Methodology/
Interpretation and Sources of Data:
|
||||
| 2.4 | Percentage of budget allocated towards cultural/sports activities | Percentage | City with the highest performance (amongst cities in the same city-size classification as given in this document) will be treated as a benchmark | |
|
Description:
This indicates the focus of the City Government on encouraging cultural and sports activities in the city. Active budgeting and expenditure by city governments on such cultural/sports activities can facilitate a vibrant socio-cultural environment within cities.
Expressed as:
Budget allocated for cultural/sports activities
X 100 =
Total budget of the ULB (capital and revenue)
Methodology/
Interpretation and Sources of Data:
|
||||
| 2.5 | Number of cultural/sports events hosted by city | Number of events | City with the highest number of events (amongst cities in the same city-size classification as given in this document) will be treated as a benchmark | |
|
Description:
This along with the previous indicator 2.4 indicates the focus of the City Government on encouraging cultural and sports activities in the city. While some of the activities may be actively funded through ULB funds, others may be supported by the city administration through facilitation of permissions and provision of land/facilities.
Expressed as:
Number of cultural/sports events hosted by the city authority in the preceding year
Methodology/
Interpretation and Sources of Data:
|
||||